Duel (AEROWALK)
apokalypze
vs
jOn
10 minutes, Deathmatch 3
Tue 16 March 2004 on Bredbandsbolaget Duel #3
ping pl frags name Kills Deaths RA YA GA
14 0 34 jOn 35 27 8 14 6
19 0 24 apokalypze 25 37 13 8 7
26 0 spec <Khorm> 0 0 0 0 0
50 0 spec inu 0 0 0 0 0
Award Score Winner(s)
Frag Streak 14 jOn
Spawn Fragger 3 apokalypze
Tuesday 16 Mar 2004, 08:12
#1:
Stig
Plz dont upload unserious games with two bad players
Tuesday 16 Mar 2004, 09:03
#2:
Hagge
plz dont comment unserious games with two bad players
Tuesday 16 Mar 2004, 09:51
#3:
fifi
two bad players?? having watched every jon-demo on chtv i can honestly say that jon is not a bad player!!
Tuesday 16 Mar 2004, 10:37
#4:
joukka
Cant see fifi writing that.
jOn is the lamest quaker ever and he dont know it
Tuesday 16 Mar 2004, 12:05
#5:
fifi
Heh wasnt me must have been jOn faking as me
Tuesday 16 Mar 2004, 14:54
#6:
fifi
please :) #3 is me yes, #5 is not
Tuesday 16 Mar 2004, 16:34
#7:
dak
Split personalities "fifi"? :D This is why anon boards should always have ip stamps.
Tuesday 16 Mar 2004, 17:16
#8:
error
Demos with jon and apo are like 1000x better than bot demos and j0n is a good dueller.
Tuesday 16 Mar 2004, 20:27
#9:
nate
agree with error
Tuesday 16 Mar 2004, 20:55
#10:
fifi
I think Finnish players is the own Swedish players. Who is agree with me
Wednesday 17 Mar 2004, 00:22
#11:
Anonymous
agree with error
Wednesday 17 Mar 2004, 04:32
#12:
Hagge
I think I?m good. sure jOn can get a frag or two vs me but I?m good!
Wednesday 17 Mar 2004, 06:00
#13:
error
True hagge but not many people get 1 or 2 frags versus you. I could probably count those people on two hands.
Wednesday 17 Mar 2004, 10:51
#14:
jOn
Lamest quaker ever? What did i do to deserve that honor? :)
Wednesday 17 Mar 2004, 11:57
#15:
Moukki
agree, there's about 1007743 ppl that has won over jon but due to jon drops he never gets on demos..
though jon uploads every game he wins
Wednesday 17 Mar 2004, 15:58
#16:
jOn
That is just a so lame comment, you know its not true... stupid fakenick
Thursday 18 Mar 2004, 05:26
#17:
EZ
agree w/ 15.
Friday 19 Mar 2004, 11:18
#18:
Jon
Tuesday 30 Mar 2004, 12:35
#19:
fakk
agree with #15
Not available (your browser doesn't seem to support WebGL)